WhatConvention.org
International legal search engine
861 convenciones multilaterales sobre el derecho del medio ambiente, los derechos humanos, el derecho humanitario y el derecho del mar
Convenio Internacional para la represión de los actos de terrorismo nuclear, 2005
Entrada en vigor: sábado, 7 de julio de 2007
: 13 abr. 2005
: New York
: Secrétaire Général des Nations Unies
Firmado por 115 países, ratificado por 103 países
Países signatarios
| Países | Fecha de firma | Fecha de ratificación * | Reserva / Declaración | Comentarios |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Afganistán
|
29 dic. 2005 |
25 mar. 2013 |
- |
|
 Albania
|
23 nov. 2005 |
- |
- |
|
 Alemania
|
15 sept. 2005 |
8 feb. 2008 |
Notifications
"… with reference to Article 9, paragraph 3 of the Convention, … the Federal Republic of Germany [makes] the following declaration: German criminal law may be applicable in the situations specified in article 9, paragraph 2. 1. Article 9, paragraph 2 (a) Whether German criminal law is applicable depends on the specific circumstances of the individual case. If offences under the Convention are committed against a German national abroad, German criminal law is applicable in accordance with section 7 (1) of the Criminal Code, provided the act is punishable at the place of its commission or the place of its commission is not subject to any criminal jurisdiction. If the objective or result of the offence is a relevant act within German territory, section 9 of the Criminal Code may be applicable in certain cases. Pursuant to subsection (1) of section 9, German criminal law is applicable if the perpetrator acted in Germany, or if the result of his action is an element of the offence and occurs on German territory or should occur there according to his understanding. Pursuant to subsection (2), acts committed abroad by an accessory may also be covered if the principal act was committed in Germany or should have been committed there according to the accessory’s understanding. 2. Article 9, paragraph 2 (b) Here, too, whether German criminal law is applicable depends on the specific circumstances of the individual case. German law may be applicable if one of the special circumstances mentioned above with respect to subparagraph (a) or below with respect to subparagraph (c) or (d) is given. In addition to those cases, German criminal law may also be applicable pursuant to section 6, paragraph 9 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes against Internationally Protected Persons, including Diplomatic Agents, of 14 December 1973. 3. Article 9, paragraph 2 (c) German criminal law is applicable pursuant to section 7 (2) paragraph 2, regardless of the habitual residence of the stateless person, if he/she is found to be in Germany and the act is punishable at the place of its commission or is not subject to any criminal jurisdiction, if the perpetrator has not been extradited although the Extradition Act would permit extradition for such an act, because a request for extradition was not made within a reasonable period, has been rejected, or the extradition is not practicable. German criminal jurisdiction is thus excluded for various types of offences, in particular, minor offences, political offences and military offences (sections 3 (2) , 6 and 7 of the Act on International Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters respectively). Stateless persons are foreigners within the meaning of section 7 (2) 2 of the Criminal Code. 4. Article 9, paragraph 2 (d) German criminal law is applicable pursuant to section 9 (1) of the Criminal Code, if the compulsion is part of the result of the act, and such result is an element of the crime. 5. Article 9, paragraph 2 (e) Pursuant to section 4 of the Criminal Code, German criminal law is applicable to acts committed in an aircraft which is entitled to fly the federal flag or the national insignia of the Federal Republic of Germany (see also article 9, paragraph 1 (b), of the Convention)." |
|
 Andorra
|
11 may. 2006 |
- |
- |
|
 Antigua y Barbuda
|
- |
1 dic. 2009 |
- |
|
 Arabia Saudita
|
26 dic. 2006 |
7 dic. 2007 |
Reservación:
El Reino declara que no se considera obligado por el artículo 23, apartado 1 de la Convención. |
|
 Argelia
|
- |
3 mar. 2011 |
Reservation:
The Government of the People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria does not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 23, paragraph 1, of the International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism. The Government of the People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria declares that it deems it essential in all cases that all parties to any dispute are in agreement over referring the dispute to arbitration or to the International Court of Justice. |
|
 Argentina
|
14 sept. 2005 |
- |
Reserva hecha a la firma:
De conformidad con el párrafo 2 del artículo 23, la República de Argentina dice que no se considera obligado por las disposiciones del párrafo 1 del artículo 23. Por lo tanto, no reconoce el arbitraje obligatorio o la jurisdicción obligatoria de la Corte Intemacional de Justicia. |
|
 Armenia
|
15 sept. 2005 |
22 sept. 2010 |
Objection to the declaration made by Azerbaijan upon ratification:
“The Republic of Azerbaijan made a declaration on September 15, 2005 with regard to the International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism at the time of signature and confirmed when depositing the instrument of ratification. Given that the Republic of Armenia declares: The Republic of Azerbaijan deliberately misrepresents the essence of the Nagorno-Karabakh issue, with respect to cause and effect of the conflict. The conflict arose due to the policy of ethnic cleansing by the Republic of Azerbaijan followed by the massive military aggression against the self-determined Nagorno-Karabakh Republic - with the aim to repress the free will of the Nagorno-Karabakh population. As a result, the Republic of Azerbaijan has occupied several territories of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic.” |
|
 Australia
|
14 sept. 2005 |
16 mar. 2012 |
- |
|
 Austria
|
15 sept. 2005 |
14 sept. 2006 |
- |
|
 Azerbaiyán
|
15 sept. 2005 |
28 ene. 2009 |
Reserva hecha a la firma y confirmada en la ratificación:
De conformidad con el párrafo 2 del artículo 23, la República de Azerbaiyán declara que no se considera obligado por el párrafo 1 del artículo 23 de la Convención. Declaración hecha a la firma y confirmada la ratificación: La República de Azerbaiyán declara que será imposible garantizar el cumplimiento de las disposiciones de la Convención en sus territorios ocupados por la República de Armenia hasta que esos territorios sean liberados de esa ocupación. |
|
 Bahrein
|
- |
4 may. 2010 |
Reservation:
The Kingdom of Bahrain does not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 23, paragraph 1, of the Convention. |
|
 Bangladesh
|
- |
7 jun. 2007 |
- |
|
 Belarús
|
15 sept. 2005 |
13 mar. 2007 |
Notifications
The Republic of Belarus establishes its jurisdiction over the offences set forth in article 2 in cases envisaged in paragraph 2 of article 9 of the Convention. |
|
 Bélgica
|
14 sept. 2005 |
2 oct. 2009 |
Declaration:
The Kingdom of Belgium declares that only nuclear materials and facilities containing nuclear materials are covered by article 18, paragraph 1(b) and (c). |
|
 Benin
|
14 sept. 2005 |
- |
- |
|
 Bosnia y Herzegovina
|
7 dic. 2005 |
- |
- |
|
 Brasil
|
16 sept. 2005 |
25 sept. 2009 |
- |
|
 Bulgaria
|
14 sept. 2005 |
- |
- |
|
 Burkina Faso
|
21 sept. 2005 |
- |
- |
|
 Burundi
|
29 mar. 2006 |
24 sept. 2008 |
- |
|
 Camboya
|
7 dic. 2006 |
- |
- |
|
 Canadá
|
17 sept. 2005 |
21 nov. 2013 |
- |
|
 Chile
|
22 sept. 2005 |
27 sept. 2010 |
- |
|
 China
|
14 sept. 2005 |
8 nov. 2010 |
Declaration:
The People's Republic of China does not consider itself bound by paragraph 1 of article 23 of the Convention. Notifications In accordance with paragraph 3 of article 9 of the Convention, the People's Republic of China has established the jurisdiction specified in paragraph 2 of article 9 of the Convention. |
|
 Chipre
|
15 sept. 2005 |
28 ene. 2008 |
- |
|
 Colombia
|
1 nov. 2006 |
- |
- |
|
 Comoras
|
- |
12 mar. 2007 |
- |
|
 Costa de Marfil
|
- |
12 mar. 2012 |
- |
|
 Costa Rica
|
15 sept. 2005 |
21 feb. 2013 |
- |
|
 Croacia
|
16 sept. 2005 |
30 may. 2007 |
- |
|
 Cuba
|
- |
17 jun. 2009 |
Reservación:
La República de Cuba declara, de conformidad con el artículo 23, apartado 2, que no se considera obligado por las disposiciones del párrafo 1 del presente artículo con respecto a la solución de las controversias que surjan entre los Estados Partes que, en su opinión, debe resolverse a través de negociaciones amistosas, y también declara que no reconoce la jurisdicción obligatoria de la Corte Internacional de Justicia. Declaraciones: La República de Cuba declara que nada en el artículo 4, apartado 2, puede considerarse como un estímulo o tolerar el uso o la amenaza del uso de la fuerza en las relaciones internacionales que, en todas las circunstancias, se rigen estrictamente por los principios del derecho internacional y la los propósitos y principios de la Carta de las Naciones Unidas. Cuba también considera que las relaciones entre Estados debe basarse en las disposiciones de la resolución 2625 (XXV). Por otra parte, el terrorismo de Estado ha sido históricamente una preocupación fundamental de Cuba, que cree que su total erradicación, mediante el respeto mutuo, las relaciones de amistad y cooperación entre los Estados, y el pleno respeto de los principios de soberanía, integridad territorial, la autodeterminación y la no injerencia en asuntos internos debe constituir una prioridad para la comunidad internacional. Por tanto, Cuba tiene la firme opinión de que el uso indebido de las fuerzas armadas de un Estado de cometer una agresión contra otro Estado, no es tolerada por el presente Convenio, cuyo objetivo es específicamente para combatir una de las plagas más nocivas que enfrenta el mundo moderno. Para condonar actos de agresión significaría efectivamente a condonar las violaciones del derecho internacional y la Carta, y de compensar los conflictos con consecuencias impredecibles, que socavaría la necesaria cohesión de la comunidad internacional en la lucha contra los flagelos que aquejan al mundo real. Además, es la comprensión de la República de Cuba, que la totalidad de las disposiciones de la presente Convención se aplicará a las actividades realizadas por las fuerzas armadas de un Estado contra otro, en ausencia de un conflicto armado entre los dos. Por último, Cuba desea dejar constancia de que se encuentra una base naval estadounidense, en contra de la voluntad del pueblo cubano y de Gobierno, en la provincia de Guantánamo, porción del territorio cubano sobre el cual el Estado cubano no ejerce su jurisdicción que le corresponde, porque de la ocupación ilegal de esa parte de su territorio por los Estados Unidos de América. En consecuencia, el Gobierno de Cuba no asume ninguna responsabilidad por la parte de su territorio a los fines del Tratado, ya que no sabe si los Estados Unidos de América ha instalado, posee, mantiene o tiene la intención de instalar el material nuclear, incluidas las armas nucleares, en esa parte del territorio cubano ilegalmente ocupado. |
|
 Dinamarca
|
14 sept. 2005 |
20 mar. 2007 |
- |
|
 Djibouti
|
14 jun. 2006 |
25 abr. 2014 |
- |
|
 Ecuador
|
15 sept. 2006 |
- |
- |
|
 Egipto
|
20 sept. 2005 |
- |
Reservation made upon signature:
1. The Arab Republic of Egypt declares its commitment to article 4 of the Convention provided that the armed forces of a State do not violate the rules and principles of international law in the exercise of their duties under that article, and also provided that the article is not interpreted as excluding the activities of armed forces during an armed conflict from the scope of application of this Convention on the grounds that the activities of States - under certain legal circumstances - are not considered terrorist activities. 2. The Arab Republic of Egypt declares that it does not consider itself bound by paragraph 1 of article 23 of the Convention. |
|
 El Salvador
|
16 sept. 2005 |
27 nov. 2006 |
|
|
 Emiratos Árabes Unidos
|
- |
10 ene. 2008 |
Reservación:
Los Emiratos Árabes Unidos, tras haber examinado el texto de la mencionada Convención y aprobado el contenido del mismo, declara formalmente su adhesión a la Convención, sujeto a una reserva con respecto al artículo 23, apartado 1 respecto del arbitraje. Los Emiratos Árabes Unidos por lo tanto no se considera obligado por el artículo 23, apartado 1 de la Convención. |
|
 es República Yugoslava de Macedonia
|
16 sept. 2005 |
19 mar. 2007 |
- |
|
 Eslovaquia
|
15 sept. 2005 |
23 mar. 2006 |
Notifications
"Pursuant to article 9, paragraph 3, of the International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism, the Slovak Republic notifies that it has established its jurisdiction in accordance with article 9, paragraph 2, subparagraphs (c), (d) and (e) of the Convention." |
|
 Eslovenia
|
14 sept. 2005 |
17 dic. 2009 |
Notifications
17 February 2010 "In accordance with Article 9 (3) of the Convention, the Republic of Slovenia hereby declares, that it has jurisdiction over all cases, defined in paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 9 of the Convention.” |
|
 España
|
14 sept. 2005 |
22 feb. 2007 |
- |
|
 Estados Unidos de América
|
14 sept. 2005 |
30 sept. 2015 |
- |
|
 Estonia
|
14 sept. 2005 |
- |
- |
|
 Federación de Rusia
|
14 sept. 2005 |
29 ene. 2007 |
Declaración:
La posición de la Federación de Rusia es que las disposiciones del artículo 16 de la Convención deben aplicarse de tal manera que se garantice la inevitabilidad de la responsabilidad por la comisión de los delitos comprendidos en el ámbito de aplicación de la Convención, sin perjuicio de la eficacia de las normas internacionales la cooperación en las cuestiones de extradición y asistencia jurídica. |
|
 Fiji
|
- |
15 may. 2008 |
- |
|
 Filipinas
|
15 sept. 2005 |
- |
- |
|
 Finlandia
|
14 sept. 2005 |
13 ene. 2009 |
- |
|
 Francia
|
14 sept. 2005 |
11 sept. 2013 |
- |
|
 Gabón
|
15 sept. 2005 |
1 oct. 2007 |
- |
|
 Georgia
|
- |
23 abr. 2010 |
Reservation:
“… the Government of Georgia makes reservation that it does not consider itself bound by article 23, paragraph 1 of the International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism to submit to arbitration disputes concerning the interpretation or application of the Convention at the request of one of the State Party. ... " Notifications "... In accordance with article 9, paragraph 3 of the Convention, Georgia establishes its jurisdiction over offences provided in article 9, paragraph 2, subparagraphs (a), (b), (c) and (d) of the Convention ..." |
|
 Ghana
|
6 nov. 2006 |
- |
- |
|
 Grecia
|
15 sept. 2005 |
- |
- |
|
 Guatemala
|
20 sept. 2005 |
- |
- |
|
 Guinea
|
16 sept. 2005 |
- |
- |
|
 Guinea Bissau
|
- |
6 ago. 2008 |
- |
|
 Guyana
|
15 sept. 2005 |
- |
- |
|
 Hungría
|
14 sept. 2005 |
12 abr. 2007 |
Notifications
"... the Republic of Hungary establishes its jurisdiction in cases mentioned in Article 9 (2) (b) and (e) of the Convention." |
|
 India
|
24 jul. 2006 |
1 dic. 2006 |
Reservation:
"India does not consider itself bound by the provision of Paragraph (1) of Article 23." |
|
 Indonesia
|
- |
30 sept. 2014 |
|
|
 Irak
|
- |
13 may. 2013 |
|
|
 Irlanda
|
15 sept. 2005 |
- |
- |
|
 Islandia
|
16 sept. 2005 |
- |
- |
|
 Islas Salomón
|
- |
24 sept. 2009 |
- |
|
 Israel
|
27 dic. 2006 |
- |
- |
|
 Italia
|
14 sept. 2005 |
- |
|
|
 Jamaica
|
5 dic. 2006 |
27 dic. 2013 |
- |
|
 Japón
|
15 sept. 2005 |
3 ago. 2007 |
- |
|
 Jordania
|
16 oct. 2005 |
29 ene. 2016 |
- |
|
 Kazajstán
|
16 sept. 2005 |
31 jul. 2008 |
- |
|
 Kenya
|
15 sept. 2005 |
13 abr. 2006 |
- |
|
 Kiribati
|
15 sept. 2005 |
26 sept. 2008 |
- |
|
 Kuwait
|
16 sept. 2005 |
5 sept. 2013 |
- |
|
 Lesotho
|
16 sept. 2005 |
22 sept. 2010 |
- |
|
 Letonia
|
16 sept. 2005 |
25 jul. 2006 |
Notifications
"In accordance with paragraph 3 of the Article 9 of the Convention, the Republic of Latvia notifies that it has established its jurisdiction over all the offences enumerated in the paragraph 2 of the Article 9 of the Convention." |
|
 Líbano
|
23 sept. 2005 |
13 nov. 2006 |
- |
|
 Liberia
|
16 sept. 2005 |
- |
- |
|
 Libia
|
16 sept. 2005 |
22 dic. 2008 |
- |
|
 Liechtenstein
|
16 sept. 2005 |
25 sept. 2009 |
- |
|
 Lituania
|
16 sept. 2005 |
19 jul. 2007 |
- |
|
 Luxemburgo
|
15 sept. 2005 |
2 oct. 2008 |
- |
|
 Madagascar
|
15 sept. 2005 |
- |
- |
|
 Malasia
|
16 sept. 2005 |
- |
- |
|
 Malawi
|
- |
7 oct. 2009 |
- |
|
 Malí
|
- |
5 nov. 2009 |
- |
|
 Malta
|
15 sept. 2005 |
26 sept. 2012 |
- |
|
 Marruecos
|
19 abr. 2006 |
31 mar. 2010 |
Reservation
The Kingdom of Morocco does not consider itself bound by article 23, paragraph 1, which provides that any dispute between two or more States Parties concerning the interpretation or application of this Convention which cannot be settled through negotiation or by other means may be referred to the International Court of Justice by application of one of the concerned parties. The Kingdom of Morocco declares that a dispute may be referred to the International Court of Justice only by agreement of all concerned parties on a case-by-case basis. |
|
 Mauricio
|
14 sept. 2005 |
- |
- |
|
 Mauritania
|
- |
28 abr. 2008 |
- |
|
 México
|
12 ene. 2006 |
27 jun. 2006 |
- |
|
 Mónaco
|
14 sept. 2005 |
- |
- |
|
 Mongolia
|
3 nov. 2005 |
6 oct. 2006 |
- |
|
 Montenegro
|
23 oct. 2006 |
- |
- |
|
 Mozambique
|
1 may. 2006 |
- |
- |
|
 Nauru
|
- |
24 ago. 2010 |
- |
|
 Nicaragua
|
15 sept. 2005 |
25 feb. 2009 |
- |
|
 Níger
|
- |
2 jul. 2008 |
- |
|
 Nigeria
|
- |
25 sept. 2012 |
|
|
 Noruega
|
16 sept. 2005 |
20 feb. 2014 |
- |
|
 Nueva Zelandia
|
14 sept. 2005 |
18 mar. 2016 |
- |
|
 Países Bajos
|
16 sept. 2005 |
30 jun. 2010 |
Notifications
" ... Declaration in respect of article 9, paragraph 3 and paragraph 2, under a, of the Convention: In accordance with Article 9, paragraph 3, and with reference to Article 9, paragraph 2, under a, of the Convention, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, for the Kingdom of Europe, has established jurisdiction over the offences under the Convention when the offence is committed against a Dutch national.” |
|
 Palau
|
15 sept. 2005 |
- |
- |
|
 Panamá
|
21 feb. 2006 |
21 jun. 2007 |
- |
|
 Paraguay
|
16 sept. 2005 |
29 ene. 2009 |
- |
|
 Perú
|
14 sept. 2005 |
29 may. 2009 |
- |
|
 Polonia
|
14 sept. 2005 |
8 abr. 2010 |
- |
|
 Portugal
|
21 sept. 2005 |
25 sept. 2014 |
- |
|
 Qatar
|
16 feb. 2006 |
15 ene. 2014 |
Upon signature:
Rerservation : with reservation on the provisions of paragraph (1) of article 23 of the Convention. |
|
 Reino Unido de Gran Bretaña e Irlanda del Norte
|
14 sept. 2005 |
24 sept. 2009 |
- |
|
 República Árabe Siria
|
14 sept. 2005 |
- |
- |
|
 República Centroafricana
|
- |
19 feb. 2008 |
- |
|
 República Checa
|
15 sept. 2005 |
25 jul. 2006 |
Notifications
"In accordance with article 9, paragraph 3 of the Convention, the Czech Republic notifies that it has established its jurisdiction over the offences set forth in article 2 of the Convention in cases referred to in article 9, subparagraph 2 (c) and 2 (d) of the Convention." |
|
 República de Corea
|
16 sept. 2005 |
29 may. 2014 |
- |
|
 República Democratica del Congo
|
- |
23 sept. 2010 |
- |
|
 República Dominicana
|
- |
11 jun. 2008 |
- |
|
 República Kirguisa
|
5 may. 2006 |
2 oct. 2007 |
- |
|
 Repuública de Moldova
|
16 sept. 2005 |
18 abr. 2008 |
Upon ratification
Declaration: “Until the full re-establishment of the territorial integrity of the Republic of Moldova, the provisions of the Convention will be applied only on the territory controlled effectively by the authorities of the Republic of Moldova.” Notifications “According to the Article 9 paragraph (3) of the Convention: the Republic of Moldova declares that the offences specified in the Article 2 of the Convention are going to be under its own jurisdiction in cases mentioned in the Article 9 paragraph (2) of this Convention.” |
|
 Rumania
|
14 sept. 2005 |
24 ene. 2007 |
Notifications
"In accordance with Article 9, paragraph 3 of the Convention, Romania declares that it establishes its jurisdiction over the offences set forth in Article 2, in all cases referred to in Article 9, paragraphs 1 and 2, in accordance with the applicable provisions of the domestic law." |
|
 Rwanda
|
6 mar. 2006 |
- |
- |
|
 San Marino
|
- |
16 dic. 2014 |
|
|
 San Vicente y las Granadinas
|
- |
8 jul. 2010 |
Reservation:
“…, in accordance with Article 23, paragraph 2 of that Convention, the Government of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines declares that Saint Vincent and the Grenadines does not consider itself bound by Article 23, paragraph 1, of the Convention. The Government of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines considers that for the submission of any dispute to arbitration or to the International Court of Justice in terms of Article 23, paragraph 1, the consent of all parties to the dispute is required in each case.” |
|
 Santa Lucía
|
- |
12 nov. 2012 |
|
|
 Santo Tomé y Príncipe
|
19 dic. 2005 |
- |
- |
|
 Senegal
|
21 sept. 2005 |
- |
- |
|
 Serbia
|
15 sept. 2005 |
16 sept. 2006 |
- |
|
 Seychelles
|
7 oct. 2005 |
- |
- |
|
 Sierra Leona
|
14 sept. 2005 |
- |
- |
|
 Singapur
|
1 dic. 2006 |
- |
- |
|
 Sri Lanka
|
14 sept. 2005 |
27 sept. 2007 |
- |
|
 Sudáfrica
|
14 sept. 2005 |
9 sept. 2007 |
- |
|
 Suecia
|
14 sept. 2005 |
18 ago. 2014 |
- |
|
 Suiza
|
14 sept. 2005 |
15 oct. 2008 |
Notifications
In accordance with article 9, paragraph 3, of the International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism, Switzerland hereby declares that it establishes its criminal jurisdiction in respect of the offences set forth in article 2 of the Convention in the cases specified in article 9, paragraph 2 (a), (b), (d) and (e) thereof. With respect to article 9, paragraph 2 (c), jurisdiction is established where the offender is present in Switzerland or is extradited to Switzerland … . |
|
 Swazilandia
|
15 sept. 2005 |
- |
- |
|
 Tailandia
|
14 sept. 2005 |
- |
- |
|
 Tayikistán
|
14 sept. 2005 |
- |
- |
|
 Timor-Leste
|
16 sept. 2005 |
- |
- |
|
 Togo
|
15 sept. 2005 |
- |
- |
|
 Túnez
|
- |
28 sept. 2010 |
- |
|
 Turkmenistán
|
- |
28 mar. 2008 |
- |
|
 Turquía
|
14 sept. 2005 |
24 sept. 2012 |
Upon signature:
Declaration: "It is the understanding of the Republic of Turkey that the term international humanitarian law in Article 4(2) of the International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism, refers to the legal instruments to which Turkey is already party to. The Article should not be interpreted as giving a different status to the armed forces and groups other than the armed forces of a state as currently understood and applied in international law and thereby creating new obligations for the Republic of Turkey." Reservation: "Pursuant to Article 23 (2) of the Convention, the Government of the Republic of Turkey declares that it does not consider itself bound by article 23(1) of the Convention. |
|
 Ucrania
|
14 sept. 2005 |
25 sept. 2007 |
- |
|
 Uruguay
|
16 sept. 2005 |
4 mar. 2016 |
- |
|
 Uzbekistán
|
- |
29 abr. 2008 |
Declaration
Article 16 of the Convention: The Republic of Uzbekistan proceeds from the fact that the provisions of Article 16 of the Convention should be applied in such a way as to ensure the inevitability of responsibility for the crimes falling within the scope of the Convention, without prejudice to the effectiveness of international cooperation on extradition and legal assistance; Paragraph 2 of Article 23 of the Convention: The Republic of Uzbekistan declares that it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of paragraph 1 of article 23 of the Convention.” Notifications Paragraph 3 of Article 9 of the Convention: The Republic of Uzbekistan notifies that it has established jurisdiction over criminal acts recognized under Article 2 of the Convention, in the cases described in paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 9 of the Convention. |
|
 Yemen
|
- |
13 oct. 2014 |
Reserva :
"... Hemos decidido aceptar la Convención, para unirse y respetar sus disposiciones , sin perjuicio de una reserva con respecto al párrafo 1 del artículo 23 ..." |
|