864 conventions multilatérales en droit de l'Environnement, droits de l'Homme, droit Humanitaire et droit de la Mer
English Français Español

Protocole additionnel aux Conventions de Genève du 12 août 1949 relatif à la protection des victimes des conflits armés internationaux, 1977

  Résultats 151 à 175   tout afficher

Pays Date de signature Date de ratification * Réserve / Déclaration Commentaires
Bahamas 10 avril 1980 - -
Ouganda 13 mars 1991 - -
Ouzbékistan 8 octobre 1993 - -
Palaos 25 juin 1996 - -
Rwanda 19 novembre 1984 - -
Saint-Kitts-et-Nevis 14 février 1986 - -
Suriname 16 décembre 1985 - -
Swaziland 2 novembre 1995 - -
République arabe syrienne 14 novembre 1983 Réserve
Déclaration formulée lors de l'adhésion:

"avec la réserve que cette adhésion ne constitue en aucune façon une reconnaissance d'Israël ni l'établissement de relations avec lui concernant l'application des dispositions dudit protocole."
-
Vanuatu 28 février 1985 - -
Venezuela (République bolivarienne du) 23 juillet 1998 - -
Oman 29 mars 1984 Réserve
Déclaration formulée lors de l'adhésion:

"En déposant ces instruments, le Gouvernement du Sultanat d'Oman déclare que ces adhésions ne représentent en aucune manière la reconnaissance ni l'établissement de relations avec Israël pour ce qui est de l'application des dispositions de ces Protocoles."
-
Mauritanie 14 mars 1980 - -
Maurice 22 mars 1982 Réserve
En Anglais seulement

"The Government of the Republic of Mauritius has the honour to declare that it objects to the inclusion of the so-called "British Indian Ocean Territory" in the list of territories mentioned in the Declaration deposited by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland with the Swiss Federal Council on 2 July 2002 concerning the applicability of the Protocols I and II Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, adopted at Geneva on 8 June 1977, and therefore rejects the said Declaration in so far as it purports to extend the ratification by the UK Government of the said Protocols to the so-called "British Indian Ocean Territory".

The Government of the Republic of Mauritius does not recognise the competence of the British Government to adhere to any international instrument on behalf of the Chagos Archipelago, which forms an integral part of the territory of the Republic of Mauritius.

The Government of the Republic of Mauritius wishes to reassert the unequivocal sovereignty of Mauritius over the Chagos Archipelago, including Diego Garcia."
-
Bahreïn 30 octobre 1986 - -
Bangladesh 8 septembre 1980 Réserve
Declarations and Reservations in relation to Additional Protocol I

1. Ireland, in ratifying Protocol I Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 adopted at Geneva on 8 June 1977, declares its belief that the provisions of this Protocol represent the minimum level of legal and actual protection bound to be afforded to persons and civilian and cultural objects in armed conflicts.

2. Article 11

For the purposes of investigating any breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 or of the Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 adopted at Geneva on 8 June 1977, Ireland reserves the right to take samples of blood, tissue, saliva or other bodily fluids for DNA comparisons from a person who is detained, interned or otherwise deprived of liberty as a result of a situation referred to in Article 1, in accordance with Irish law and normal Irish medical practice, standards and ethics.

3. Article 11 paragraph 2(c)

Ireland declares that nothing in Article 11 paragraph 2(c) shall prohibit the donation of tissue, bone marrow or of an organ from a person who is detained, interned or otherwise deprived of liberty as a result of a situation referred to in Article 2 to a close relative who requires a donation of tissue, bone marrow or an organ from such a person for medical reasons, so long as the removal of tissue, bone marrow or organs for transplantation is in accordance with Irish law and the operation is carried out in accordance with normal Irish medical practice, standards and ethics.

4. Article 28 paragraph 2

Given the practical need to make use of non-dedicated aircraft for medical evacuation purposes, Ireland does not interpret this paragraph as precluding the presence on board of communication equipment and encryption materials or the use thereof solely to facilitate navigation, identification or communication in support of medical transportation as defined in Article 8 (f).

5. Article 35

Ireland accepts, as stated in Article 35 paragraph 1, that the right of Parties to the conflict to choose methods or means of warfare is not unlimited. In view of the potentially destructive effect of nuclear weapons, Ireland declares that nuclear weapons, even if not directly governed by Additional Protocol I, remain subject to existing rules of international law as confirmed in 1996 by the International Court of Justice in its Advisory Opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons.

6. Articles 41, 56, 57, 58, 78 and 86

It is the understanding of Ireland that in relation to Article 41, 56, 57, 58, 78 and 86 the word "feasible" means that which is practicable or practically possible, taking into account all circumstances at the time, including humanitarian and military considerations.

7. Article 44


It is the understanding of Ireland that:

a. The situation described in the second sentence of paragraph 3 of Article 44 can exist only in occupied territory or in armed conflicts covered by paragraph 4 of Article 1: and

b. The word "deployment" in paragraph 3 of Article 44 includes any movement towards a place from which an attack is to be launched.

8. Article 47

It is the understanding of Ireland that Article 47 in no way prejudices the application of Articles 45(3) and 75 of Protocol I to mercenaries as defined in this Article.

9. Articles 51 to 58

In relation to Articles 51 to 58 inclusive, it is the understanding of Ireland that military commanders others responsible for planning, deciding upon, or executing attacks necessarily have to reach decisions on the basis of their assessment of the information from all sources which is reasonably available to them at the relevant time.

10. Article 53

It is the understanding of Ireland in relation to the protection of cultural objects in Article 53 that if the objects protected by this Article are unlawfully used for military purposes they will thereby lose protection from attacks directed against such unlawful military use.

11. Article 55

In ensuring that care shall be taken in warfare to protect the natural environment against widespread, long-term and severe damage and taking account of the prohibition of the use of methods or means of warfare which are intended or may be expected to cause such damage to the natural environment thereby prejudicing the health or survival of the population, Ireland declares that nuclear weapons, even if not directly governed by Additional Protocol I, remain subject to existing rules of international law as confirmed in 1996 by the International Court of Justice in its Advisory Opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons. Ireland will interpret and apply this Article in a way which leads to the best possible protection for the civilian population.

12. Article 62

It is the understanding of Ireland that nothing in Article 62 will prevent Ireland from using assigned civil defence personnel or volunteer civil defence workers in Ireland in accordance with nationally established priorities regardless of the military situation.

13. Article 75 paragraph 4(e)

Article 75 will be applied in Ireland insofar as paragraph 4(e) is not incompatible with the power enabling a judge, in exceptional circumstances, to order the removal of an accused from the court who causes a disturbance at the trial.

14. Article 90

Ireland declares that it recognises ipso facto and without special agreement, in relation to any other High Contracting Party accepting the same obligation, the competence of the International Fact-Finding Commission to enquire into allegations by such other Party, as authorised by Article 90 of Protocol I Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949. The exercise by the Commission of powers and functions in Ireland shall be in accordance with Irish law.

15. Article 96 paragraph 3

It is the understanding of Ireland that the making of a unilateral declaration does not in itself, validate the credentials of the persons making such a declaration and that States are entitled to satisfy themselves as to whether in fact the makers of such a declaration, constitute an authority referred to in Article 96. In this respect, the fact that such authority has or has not been recognised as such by the UN or an appropriate regional intergovernmental organisation is relevant.

Additional Protocol II

1. Ireland, in ratifying Protocol II Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 adopted at Geneva on 8 June 1977, declares its belief that the provisions of this Protocol represent the minimum level of legal and actual protection bound to be afforded to persons and civilian and cultural objects in armed conflicts.

2. Article 6 paragraph 2(e)

Article 6 will be applied in Ireland insofar as paragraph 2(e) is not incompatible with the power enabling a judge, in exceptional circumstances, to order the removal of an accused from the court who causes a disturbance at the trial.
-
Cameroun 16 mars 1984 - -
Cap-Vert 16 mars 1995 - -
Djibouti 8 avril 1991 - -
Dominique 25 avril 1996 - -
Grenade 23 septembre 1998 - -
Kazakhstan 5 mai 1992 - -
Kenya 23 février 1999 - -
Mali 8 février 1989 - -
Afghanistan 10 novembre 2009 - -